Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Number of items
24 (original: 8 per component); the 1993 revision has 18 (6 per component)
Meta-analytic and primary studies commonly report alphas around .82–.88 for affective, .73–.80 for continuance, and .73–.80 for normative commitment.
Validity evidence
Extensive construct-validity evidence: CFA consistently distinguishes the three components; affective commitment shows the strongest criterion links with turnover, OCB and performance. Debates persist about the dimensionality of continuance commitment (sacrifice vs. lack of alternatives) and the overlap between affective and normative commitment.
Populations & contexts
Employees across industries, occupations and dozens of countries; the standard commitment measure in OB/HRM research.
Origin, translations & adaptations
Canada. Translated into many languages with generally supportive measurement-invariance evidence; cross-cultural studies suggest the normative component behaves differently in collectivist contexts.
Licensing & permission
Free academic license required (register with the authors) The TCM Employee Commitment Survey is distributed under an academic-use license, free for non-commercial research upon registration (via the authors' university site); commercial or consulting use requires a paid license.
How to cite (APA 7)
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Short versions & notable variants
Revised 18-item version (Meyer, Allen, & Smith, 1993, Journal of Applied Psychology) — 6 items per component; the most used form today